Correct
money management is easy to explain. It is almost impossible to adhere to.
There
have been about as many 'systems' for varying the bet size as there are
systems to beat the craps table. None of them work and all of them do harm by
giving false expectations. Double-up systems, star betting, the Kelly
Criterion, etc. all have the same thing in common. They adversely affect the
cash flow and they raise the breakeven percentage that must be accomplished.
|
“There have been about as many
'systems' for varying the bet size as there are systems to beat the craps
table. None of them work and all of them do harm by giving false
expectations.”
|
Any
time you vary your bet size by the slightest amount, you increase the
breakeven percentage of 52.38. If you refigure your percentage after each
bet, your breakeven jumps to over 55%. If you have 1 star and 5 star bets or
bet twice as much on some plays, you should understand that only the large
bets are meaningful to whether you will be a winner. You might as well not
bet the smaller ones. In the end, they won't matter.
Some
touts say you should increase your bet when you are on a winning streak and
decrease it when you are on a losing streak. The key word is 'are'. If you won yesterday, you 'were' on a
winning streak. But that was yesterday. If you know you will win today, why
not bet it all? If you know you will lose today, you might consider not
betting at all.
The
problem with bet size is not the streaks, but the breakeven. If you have a
56% advantage on each bet, over 200 games you will win less than 50% about
17% of the time.You will win more than 60% about
17% of the time. Winning 100 and losing 100 with a 5% unit, you will lose 50%
of your bankroll to the vigorish. (100 wins times $50 less 100 losses times
$55 equals minus $500 on a $1,000 bankroll).You will lower your bet and never
get even. I recommend playing no more than 2% of your bankroll. Anything over
2% is unacceptably risky, even for recreational bettors.
The
reality is that each person may be trying to accomplish something different.
If your goal is to afford entertainment and not go broke, that is entirely
different than my goal of making a living. If you bet $100 a game on Monday
night football to enjoy the game, it will cost you $5 a week if you can go
50-50. There is nothing wrong with that. It's cheaper than a movie. But that is entertainment expense, not
an excellent investment vehicle.
|
“If your goal is to afford
entertainment and not go broke, that is entirely different than my goal of
making a living.”
|
To
do sports betting in a serious way, you must treat it as you would any other
business. In sports betting, your inventory is your cash. If you run out of
cash, you are out of business. The old saying is that you should not use your
rent money to bet with. That is true. But if you're betting for a living it
is equally true that you must not use your gambling bankroll to pay the rent.
The
amazing thing about sports betting is the return on investment (ROI) that is
possible. And there is no magic. The return on investment is a function of
the winning percentage and the amount that is invested. The amount invested
is a function of how many games (investments) are bet and how much is bet on
each game. It is the same as any business. How many widgets did you sell and
how much did you gross per widget.
In
my case, I average between 1,000 and 1,200 plays per year. Let's call it
1,000. My pain tolerance is a 1% unit. I will bet 1.1% of my bankroll on
every bet. That means I will bet 1% of my money 1,000 times...1000% of my
bankroll....That's 1000% of my bankroll. And again, I will bet 1000% of my
bankroll. The same money 10 times in a year. That is why such a return is
possible.
|
“…you should not use your rent
money to bet with… But if you're betting for a living it is equally true
that you must not use your gambling bankroll to pay the rent.”
|
Now
if I can win 56% of my plays, I will get a return on investment of nearly
100%. I will win 560 bets and lose 440 bets. I will pay a broker fee to the
sportsbook of 44 bets. Therefore, I will win 76 units. (76 times 1% equals
76%). I will win $7.60 for every $100 that I bet. I will explain later how I
end up with 100%.
A
word here on that $7.60. I've seen many people come to town and try to make a
living playing sports. Some of them think they can bet $100 a game and do it.
Well, think about it. If they play 20 games a week, they will bet $2,000 and,
if they are good, make $7.60 times 20=$152. At $200 a game, they can expect
$308. That's pretty hard to live on. I think the minimum that must be bet is
$500. That's only $760 a week and leaves no room for a bad streak. To bet
$500 at 1%, you need $50,000. Like any business, you should continue to
invest some of the profits to grow the business.
As
soon as you can draw from the business, you should put yourself on a salary. That
way you can know what to expect for an income and won't be bothered by the
short term vagaries of Lady Luck.
You
just need to know the number of bets, the amount per bet, and the win
percentage, and you will know what to pay the IRS next year.
After
19 years, I know the number of plays I have each year. I know what my bet
size is. And with 1,000 plays, the standard deviation for my win percentage
is 2. So I know I will win between 55% and 57%. Sounds rather dull when I put
it that way. And I guess it actually is. Bernard Baruch, the great financier,
said he always looked for boring businesses. They were well run, without
surprises and he knew what to expect.
I
know what to expect. One great lesson my nephew, J.V., pointed out to me was
that with a 56% expectation, your bankroll would reach a new high only 5% of
the time. Nineteen out of 20 days you will be below your bankroll high. The
novice thinks you should have more money each day. I also know that with a
56% win rate and 100 bets a month, I will lose money every 9th month. Good
money management is aided by knowing what to expect.
|
“One great lesson my nephew, J.V.,
pointed out to me was that with a 56% expectation, your bankroll would
reach a new high only 5% of the time.”
|
As
a final note on bet size, I should add that I use a plateau system.
I
bet 1% of my bank and continue to flat bet until my bank grows by at least
25%. Then I recalculate the 1%. Thus if I started with $10,000, I would bet
$100 a game until my bank grows to at least $12,500. At that point, I would
refigure my unit to $125. It would stay there until I reached at least
$15,625. That way my actual risk reward ratio doesn't get too high. The other
thing that I do that is unique and rather arguable is that I never lower my
bet. Remember, if you vary the bet, your breakeven goes up. At a 1% unit and
19 years of experience, I'm comfortable that I can ride through a losing
streak. If you lose 10 games at $200 a bet and lower the bet to $180, you
must win 12.2 bets to get back to even. That is how I get my 100% annual ROI.
My actual bet goes up during the year as my bankroll reaches higher plateaus.to get full ebook to start making money and investing on sport betting mail gisttablet01@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment